gliders
glider design
glider build
final glider
flight data
conclusion
1. The word aft was difficult to understand for me. Aft means at, near, or toward the stern of a ship or tail of an aircraft.
2. Challenges that people would face is where to put everything and making objects that have angles.
3. The only challenge to me was getting the highest score with the design that I wanted.
4. To me they were both equally challenging because one would just do what the program told them to do.
5. The constraints didn't really impact our design.
6. The proposal process lets the people know what is expected and what will happen.
7. Error can be made in the building process and using the wrong materials, but proposals let the people know what is expected and what should be done.
8. The glider's pretty cool design, and the results of flight testing.
9. People would have a positive impression because of the stylish design and the distance that it got. They would have a negative response because some of the lower distances might cause some concerns.
10. The glider wasn't as stable as I expected at first because it kept leaning either right or left. Once we got the glider wings balanced the glider was stable.
11. We used tape to balance the glider and kept the nose mass as light as we could.
12. We needed about 2 or 3 before the fuselage broke. After it broke we just kept testing it with different modifications.
13. It pushes designers to make the best glider that they can due to a competitive nature in humans. This can also discourage someone who's glider didn't fly very far.
14. The glider flew a little better than I thought it would.
15. The bigger gliders, assuming that it was balanced, flew further than the smaller ones.
2. Challenges that people would face is where to put everything and making objects that have angles.
3. The only challenge to me was getting the highest score with the design that I wanted.
4. To me they were both equally challenging because one would just do what the program told them to do.
5. The constraints didn't really impact our design.
6. The proposal process lets the people know what is expected and what will happen.
7. Error can be made in the building process and using the wrong materials, but proposals let the people know what is expected and what should be done.
8. The glider's pretty cool design, and the results of flight testing.
9. People would have a positive impression because of the stylish design and the distance that it got. They would have a negative response because some of the lower distances might cause some concerns.
10. The glider wasn't as stable as I expected at first because it kept leaning either right or left. Once we got the glider wings balanced the glider was stable.
11. We used tape to balance the glider and kept the nose mass as light as we could.
12. We needed about 2 or 3 before the fuselage broke. After it broke we just kept testing it with different modifications.
13. It pushes designers to make the best glider that they can due to a competitive nature in humans. This can also discourage someone who's glider didn't fly very far.
14. The glider flew a little better than I thought it would.
15. The bigger gliders, assuming that it was balanced, flew further than the smaller ones.